The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's a slightly slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-875K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $4.00 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-875K
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 2% cheaper – $174.02 vs $178.02
- A better value for money for gaming
FX-8320E vs Core i7-875K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
126
100%
Min 1% FPS
94
100%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i7-875K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-875K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-875K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-875K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $353.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Vishera | Codename | Lynnfield |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
