In Deathloop, the FX-8320E is slightly faster than the Core i7-8700. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $21 more expensive!
FX-8320E
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Core i7-8700
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Oct 05, 2017 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $157.19 vs $178.02
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Deathloop – $0.71 vs $0.80/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
89%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$157.19
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
