The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-7700 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $38.02 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
The Core i7-7700 is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-7700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 21% cheaper – $140.00 vs $178.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Core i7-7700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Core i7-7700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-7700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-7700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-7700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
