In Deathloop, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 4 years and 7 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
223 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
99%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
57%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
