In Atomfall, the FX-8320E is slower than the Core i5-14400 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $14 cheaper!
FX-8320E
- Up to 7% cheaper – $178.02 vs $192.45
- Up to 7% cheaper
Core i5-14400
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 233 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall – $0.82 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 13% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i5-14400: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
188 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
81%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
87%
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
174 FPS
100%
Price, $
$192.45
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-14400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i5-14400 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$147.00 | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
