Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2681 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than FX-8320E - 158 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than FX-8320E - $143.57 vs $178.02
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-8320E - $0.91 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320E doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $178.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7193 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7194 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |