Header Background
Background
Background
Background
FPS Calculator Background

FX-8320E vs Core i3-4130T: Valheim

FPS Winner
vs

In Valheim, the FX-8320E is same performance as the Core i3-4130T. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $154 more expensive!

FX-8320E

  • Is 1 year newerSep 02, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
  • Is 1 year newer

Core i3-4130T

  • Up to 87% cheaper$23.99 vs $178.02
  • Up to 87% cheaper
  • Up to 86% better value in Valheim – $0.11 vs $0.81/FPS
  • Up to 86% better value in Valheim
  • Consumes up to 63% less energy35 vs 95 Watts
  • Consumes up to 63% less energy

Valheim FPS Calculator

FX-8320E vs Core i3-4130T: Comparison of performance and price

Synthetic Benchmarks

The FX-8320E vs Core i3-4130T in synthetic CPU benchmarks

AMD FX-8320E Logo

FX-8320E

Sep 2nd, 2014


Geekbench 6 Single-Core

463

50%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

1769

96%

Intel Core i3-4130T Logo

Core i3-4130T

Sep 1st, 2013


Geekbench 6 Single-Core

930

100%

Geekbench 6 Multi-Core

1841

100%

Performance Specifications

The FX-8320E vs Core i3-4130T in core CPU performance specifications

AMD FX-8320E Logo

FX-8320E

Sep 2nd, 2014


Cores

8-core

100%

L3 Cache

8 MB

100%


Base Frequency

3.2 GHz

100%

Turbo Frequency

4 GHz

100%

Max. DDR3 RAM Speed

1866 MHz

100%

Intel Core i3-4130T Logo

Core i3-4130T

Sep 1st, 2013


Cores

2-core

25%

L3 Cache

3 MB

38%


Base Frequency

2.9 GHz

91%

Turbo Frequency

GHz

Max. DDR3 RAM Speed

MHz

Specifications

Comparison of core specifications

AMD FX-8320E Logo

FX-8320E

Sep 2nd, 2014

Specifications

Comparison of core specifications

Intel Core i3-4130T Logo

Core i3-4130T

Sep 1st, 2013

Other Popular CPU Comparisons

The most compared CPUs against the FX-8320E and Core i3-4130T

28 items
FPS Calculator Background

FX-8320E vs Core i3-4130T in Other Games

The FPS you'll get in other games, click on a game to view it

124 items

TOP 3+ for Price

TOP 2+ for Price

TOP 1 for Price

Found  CPUs

Popularity