In Atomfall, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the Core i3-4000M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
- Is 11 months and 28 days newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 11 months and 28 days newer
Core i3-4000M
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 37 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i3-4000M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
188 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
98%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-4000M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-4000M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Sep 4th, 2013 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG3 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
