In Battlefield V, the FX-8320E is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320E
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 16% faster in Battlefield V – 255 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Battlefield V
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Battlefield V FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
220 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
79%
Price, $
$178.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 58W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
