In Atomfall, the FX-8320E is slower than the Core i3-14100 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $29 more expensive!
FX-8320E
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 16% cheaper – $149.35 vs $178.02
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall – $0.64 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 32% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 60 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
189 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
83%
Price, $
$178.02
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
68%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
