In Helldivers 2, the FX-8320E is same performance as the Celeron G3930. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $149 more expensive!
FX-8320E
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
- Up to 84% cheaper – $29.00 vs $178.02
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Helldivers 2 – $0.15 vs $0.94/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Helldivers 2
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Helldivers 2 FPS Calculator
FX-8320E vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$178.02
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
16%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
132 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320E Sep 2nd, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
