In The Last of Us Part I, the FX-8320 is same performance as the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3450
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
99%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $241.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
