Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $102.02 vs $495.36
- Up to 65% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.23 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 71% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-8320 - 761 vs 445 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $102.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7370 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
761
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
35%
Price, $
$495.36
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7370 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |