In Control, the FX-8320 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 4100 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $20 more expensive!
FX-8320
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 22% cheaper – $68.58 vs $88.10
- Up to 22% cheaper
- Up to 23% better value in Control – $0.27 vs $0.35/FPS
- Up to 23% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$88.1
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
77%
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM4 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
