In Rust, the FX-8320 is same performance as the FX-8300. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $18 cheaper!
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
84%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
