HowManyFPS Desktop AppTrack Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core Ultra 7 265F vs FX-8320

The Core Ultra 7 265F is faster than the FX-8320 on average across 100+ games. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $242.24 more expensive!

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 16% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 12 years and 5 months newer
Up to 124% more expensive – $316.00 vs $73.76

CPU

All CPUs

Up to 124% cheaper – $73.76 vs $316.00
Up to 94% better value for money

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Escape From Tarkov2017

Core Ultra 7 265F

259FPS

FX-8320

246FPS

Fortnite2017

Core Ultra 7 265F

325FPS

FX-8320

331FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core Ultra 7 265F

223FPS

FX-8320

218FPS

Valorant2020

Core Ultra 7 265F

774FPS

FX-8320

709FPS

League of Legends2009

396FPS

338FPS

730FPS

673FPS

Minecraft2011

Core Ultra 7 265F

811FPS

FX-8320

743FPS

Overwatch 22023

Core Ultra 7 265F

567FPS

FX-8320

550FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

59%

FX-8320

45%

Core Ultra 7 265F ranks 14 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

FX-8320

Core Ultra 7 265F has 12 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

FX-8320

Core Ultra 7 265F has 12 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

30 MB

FX-8320

8 MB

Core Ultra 7 265F has 22 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

2.4 GHz

FX-8320

3.5 GHz

FX-8320 has a 46% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

5.3 GHz

FX-8320

4 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265F boosts 32% higher.

TDPhelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

65W

FX-8320

125W

Core Ultra 7 265F draws 60W less power.

Pricehelp

Core Ultra 7 265F

$316.00

FX-8320

$73.76

FX-8320 is $242.24 cheaper.

Core Ultra 7 265FFX-8320

LGA1851

Sockethelp

AM3+

Arrow Lake-S

Codenamehelp

Vishera

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Desktop

No Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPUhelp

No Integrated Graphics

6400 MHz (DDR5)

RAMhelp

DDR3

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core Ultra 7 265F or FX-8320?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F. It's 31% faster than the FX-8320 on average across 100+ games, scoring 59/100 vs 45/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265F than FX-8320?expand_more

31% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core Ultra 7 265F or FX-8320?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265F worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 59/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core Ultra 7 265F and FX-8320?expand_more

Performance: Core Ultra 7 265F scores 59/100, FX-8320 scores 45/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core Ultra 7 265F or FX-8320 bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core Ultra 7 265F or FX-8320?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265F is the stronger pick at 59/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.

Recent Public Benchmarks

View All

All GPUs

All CPUs

Popular Comparisons