The FX-8320 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-11900KF and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $217.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 68% cheaper – $102.02 vs $320.00
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-11900KF cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-11900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8320 vs Core i9-11900KF for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
206
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, $
$320
31%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
39%
FX-8320 vs Core i9-11900KF in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-11900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-11900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-11900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $513.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
