In Deathloop, the FX-8320 is slightly faster than the Core i7-7700K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $106 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 55% cheaper – $88.10 vs $194.01
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 56% better value in Deathloop – $0.39 vs $0.88/FPS
- Up to 56% better value in Deathloop
Core i7-7700K
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 91 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i7-7700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
223 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$194.01
45%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
44%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-7700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-7700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7700K
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7700K Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
