The FX-8320 is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-3930K, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $177.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper – $102.02 vs $280.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-3930K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i7-3930K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
FX-8320 vs Core i7-3930K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$280
36%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
37%
FX-8320 vs Core i7-3930K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-3930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-3930K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $583.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
125 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |