In Rust, the FX-8320 is slower than the Core i7-14700KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $269 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 75% cheaper – $88.10 vs $357.07
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 67% better value in Rust – $0.42 vs $1.27/FPS
- Up to 67% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700KF
- Up to 34% faster in Rust – 280 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 years and 11 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i7-14700KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
45%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
280 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
91 FPS
100%
Price, $
$357.07
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
33%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-14700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-14700KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $384.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
