In Dead Space, the FX-8320 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8320
No clear advantages
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 5% faster in Dead Space – 183 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Dead Space
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
174 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
88%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
