In Rust, the FX-8320 is slower than the Core i5-12400F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $92 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 51% cheaper – $88.10 vs $179.99
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 41% better value in Rust – $0.42 vs $0.71/FPS
- Up to 41% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12400F
- Up to 20% faster in Rust – 250 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i5-12400F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
209 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
58%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
250 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
48%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
59%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i5-12400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i5-12400F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12400F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $174.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
