In Deathloop, the FX-8320 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $61 cheaper!
FX-8320
- Up to 41% cheaper – $88.10 vs $149.35
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Deathloop – $0.39 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Deathloop
Core i3-14100
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8320 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
97%
Price, $
$88.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
58%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8320 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
