In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8300 is faster than the Ryzen 9 7900X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $268 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 85% cheaper – $46.90 vs $314.95
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $1.85/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 95 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$314.95
14%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
