In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8300 is faster than the Ryzen 7 8700G and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $237 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 83% cheaper – $46.90 vs $284.22
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.23 vs $1.68/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 7 8700G
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 8700G: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
199 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$284.22
16%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 8700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 8700G in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
36%
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700G Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | AM5 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon 780M |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
