In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8300 is faster than the Ryzen 7 7435HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8300
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 7435HS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | FP7 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
