Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $106.06 vs $197.00
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 326% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8300 - 98 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 56% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8300 - $2.01 vs $4.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197
53%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |