In GRID, the FX-8300 is same performance as the Core Ultra 9 285K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $404 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 79% cheaper – $106.06 vs $509.99
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in GRID – $0.21 vs $1.05/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in GRID
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 12 years and 1 day newer
GRID FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.99
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
20%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
95W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
