The FX-8300 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $363.93 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8300
- Up to 77% cheaper – $106.06 vs $469.99
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
FX-8300 vs Core i9-14900F
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
239
100%
Min 1% FPS
162
100%
Price, $
$469.99
22%
Value, $/FPS
$1.96/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake-R |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
