Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of FX-8300
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $106.06 vs $578.97
- Up to 77% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-14900 - $0.58 vs $2.50 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 27% better in Escape From Tarkov than FX-8300 - 232 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
Buy for $578.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8300 | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |