In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8300 is slightly slower than the Core i7-860S. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8300
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-860S
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 200 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 82 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 14% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i7-860S: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
200 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
99%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-860S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-860S in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i7-860S
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-860S Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 82 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
