In Control, the FX-8300 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $463 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 91% cheaper – $46.90 vs $509.88
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in Control – $0.19 vs $2.00/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 254 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 9 years and 11 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
96%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.88
9%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
10%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
