In GRID, the FX-8300 is same performance as the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $283 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 86% cheaper – $46.90 vs $329.95
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in GRID – $0.09 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in GRID
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
GRID FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
485 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
292 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
14%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
64%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
