In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8300 is slightly slower than the Core i5-650 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $43 more expensive!
FX-8300
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Core i5-650
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 202 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 41% cheaper – $63.03 vs $106.06
- Up to 41% cheaper
- Up to 42% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.31 vs $0.53/FPS
- Up to 42% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 23% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
198 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
98%
Price, $
$106.06
59%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
58%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.03
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
