In Deathloop, the FX-8300 is slightly slower than the Core i5-430M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8300
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Core i5-430M
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i5-430M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
221 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i5-430M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i5-430M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i5-430M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.534 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-430M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
