In Atomfall, the FX-8300 is slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $102 cheaper!
FX-8300
- Up to 69% cheaper – $46.90 vs $149.35
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall – $0.24 vs $0.64/FPS
- Up to 62% better value in Atomfall
Core i3-14100
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 230 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 60 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 37% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8300 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
190 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
83%
Price, $
$46.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
38%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8300 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8300 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
