The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 2700 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $93.98 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 53% cheaper – $82.02 vs $176.00
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 7 2700 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 2700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$176
46%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
51%
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 2700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 2700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 7 2700 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Zambezi | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |