In Rust, the FX-8150 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $454 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 90% cheaper – $51.29 vs $505.16
- Up to 90% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $1.75/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Rust
Core Ultra 9 285K
- Up to 38% faster in Rust – 288 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 38% faster in Rust
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
209 FPS
73%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
42%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
288 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
97 FPS
100%
Price, $
$505.16
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
14%
![Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Tetracosa-core [24 Core] 3.70 GHz Processor - OEM Pack - Box](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0DFKC99VL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 9 285K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
