In Atomfall, the FX-8150 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $248 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 83% cheaper – $51.29 vs $298.98
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall – $0.27 vs $1.20/FPS
- Up to 78% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 13 years and 12 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
75%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
22%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
