In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8150 is faster than the Core i9-14900K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $388 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 88% cheaper – $51.29 vs $438.99
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 90% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.25 vs $2.58/FPS
- Up to 90% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i9-14900K
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$438.99
11%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
10%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
