In Rust, the FX-8150 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $196 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 79% cheaper – $51.29 vs $247.30
- Up to 79% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $1.06/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 233 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
209 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
69%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
233 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
100%
Price, $
$247.3
20%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
