In Atomfall, the FX-8150 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $330 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 87% cheaper – $51.29 vs $380.99
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall – $0.27 vs $1.74/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 218 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
188 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
86%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380.99
13%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
