In Rust, the FX-8150 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $279 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 84% cheaper – $51.29 vs $329.95
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Rust – $0.24 vs $1.40/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 12% faster in Rust – 235 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
209 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
67%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
15%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
