In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the FX-8150 is much slower than the Core i5-14400 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $141 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 73% cheaper – $51.29 vs $192.45
- Up to 73% cheaper
Core i5-14400
- Up to 2825% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 117 vs 4 FPS
- Up to 2825% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 87% better value in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – $1.64 vs $12.82/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i5-14400: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
4 FPS
3%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.82/FPS
13%
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
117 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$192.45
26%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i5-14400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i5-14400 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-14400
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $221.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
