In Deathloop, the FX-8150 is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $48 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
- Up to 48% cheaper – $51.29 vs $98.95
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Deathloop – $0.23 vs $0.43/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Deathloop
Core i3-330M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 228 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
222 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
98%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
171 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
51%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
