In Control, the FX-8150 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $87 cheaper!
FX-8150
- Up to 63% cheaper – $51.29 vs $138.54
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 63% better value in Control – $0.20 vs $0.54/FPS
- Up to 63% better value in Control
Core i3-14100
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 252 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 60 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-8150 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
245 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
97%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.54
37%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
37%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
