In The Last of Us Part II, the FX-8120 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-8120
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Oct 12, 2011 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 203 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
FX-8120 vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
201 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
99%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
