In Atomfall, the FX-8120 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $392 cheaper!
FX-8120
- Up to 91% cheaper – $38.10 vs $429.99
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall – $0.20 vs $1.73/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
187 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
75%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
8%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
