In Dead Space, the FX-8120 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $394 cheaper!
FX-8120
- Up to 91% cheaper – $38.10 vs $431.99
- Up to 91% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Dead Space – $0.21 vs $2.33/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Dead Space
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space – 185 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Dead Space
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 5 days newer
Dead Space FPS Calculator
FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
174 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
86%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
185 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
103 FPS
100%
Price, $
$431.99
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.33/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
