In Rust, the FX-8120 is slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $438 cheaper!
FX-8120
- Up to 92% cheaper – $38.10 vs $476.00
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 89% better value in Rust – $0.18 vs $1.71/FPS
- Up to 89% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 278 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 12 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
44%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
8%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
11%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8120 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
